Interim Title IX and Anti-harassment and discrimination policy
North Greenville University is a Christ-centered higher education
institution committed to promoting, maintaining and strengthening an
environment rooted in the biblical principles of truth, love, and grace.
As a Christian higher education institution, our posture rests upon and
arises from teaching, upholding, and advancing ethical standards drawn
directly from Scripture. NGU affirms that all members of our community
are created in the image of God, and therefore, should be treated with
dignity and respect. The University does not unlawfully discriminate on
the basis of any characteristic protected by applicable federal or
state law, including race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin or
disability. NGU respects the inherent worth of each member of the
community and does not tolerate any form of harassment.
Students, faculty, administrators, and staff are encouraged to report
any incidents related to this policy, and pursue the matter through the
state's civil and/or criminal systems as well as through the
University.
THE LAW
Title IX provides that no person shall, on the basis of sex, be
excluded from participation in, or be denied the benefits of, or be
subjected to discrimination under any education program or any activity
receiving Federal financial assistance. Both men and women can be
victims of sex discrimination.
Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title
IX. Title IX prohibits sex discrimination in both the educational and
employment settings. Further, the Violence Against Women Reauthorization
Act of 2013 (“VAWA”) became effective as of March 7, 2014, and covers
domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking (“VAWA
Complaints”). VAWA Complaints are also a form of sex harassment and are
referred to the Title IX Coordinator.
Title VII, the ADA, and ADEA also provide that no employee of NGU
shall be unlawfully discriminated against on the basis of any
characteristic protected by applicable federal or state law, including
race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or disability.
THE SCRIPTURES
In addition to compliance with federal, state, and local laws, NGU’s
policies are rooted in and arise from our doctrinal foundation.
Accordingly, the University’s policies reflect the sincerity of our
commitment to think and act in a way that is in keeping with biblical
instruction. Our religious commitments include the belief that
Scripture is the final rule of all Christian faith and practice. We
believe that God has established marriage as a lifelong, exclusive
relationship between one man and one woman and that all intimate sexual
activity outside the marriage relationship, whether heterosexual,
homosexual, or otherwise, is contrary to God’s creative order and
express will (Gen. 2:24-25; Ex. 20:14, 17, 22:19; Lev. 18:22-23,
20:13, 15-16; Matt. 19:4-6, 9; Rom. 1:18-31; I Cor. 6:9-10, 15-20; I
Tim. 1:8-11; Jude 7). We believe that God created the human race male
and female and that all conduct with the intent to adopt a gender
identity other than one’s birth gender is also contrary to God’s
creative order and express will (Gen. 1:27; Deut. 22:5).
North Greenville University prohibits unlawful discrimination and
harassment of its employees and students in any form. In maintaining
this policy, the University seeks to assert basic Christian precepts, to
affirm ethical standards universally accepted in the workplace,
classroom and other locations, and to uphold existing applicable federal
and state law.
All forms of prohibited conduct under this policy are regarded as
serious University offenses, and violations will result in discipline,
up to and including separation from the University. Some forms of
prohibited conduct may also violate state and federal laws, and criminal
prosecution may occur independently of any disciplinary action imposed
by the University.
Therefore, as a Christian higher education institution teaching,
upholding, and advancing ethical standards drawn from Scripture, NGU
calls upon each employee and student to respect and care for every
member of the NGU community. Following in step with the teachings of the
Bible, NGU has put in place firm policies, along with instructional and
investigative structures, so as to teach effectively against all
harassment and abuse; including that which is sex-based. Retaliation against individuals reporting and/or participating
in the investigation process of discrimination, harassment and/or sexual
violence claims will not be tolerated and is subject to discipline up
to and including separation from the University.
+ Title IX Coordinator and officers with authority under title IX
Any claims of sexual harassment and/or discrimination should be
submitted online, by mail, by email, or in person to one of the
following University officials:
University Officials with Authority (OWA) to Resolve Title IX Claims
Justin Brown, Justin.brown@ngu.edu, Deputy Title IX Coordinator of Training and Athletics, Tingle Student Life Center, Room 104 phone: 864-977-7075
Stuart Floyd, stuart.floyd@ngu.edu, Deputy Title IX Coordinator of Informal Resolutions, Tingle Student Life Center, Room 129, phone: 864-977-7669
Dr. Tracy Kramer, tracy.kramer@ngu.edu, Deputy Title IX Coordinator of Investigations, Tim Brashier Campus, Room 231, phone: 864-977-7256
Dr. Jill Rayburn, jill.rayburn@ngu.edu, Title IX Coordinator, Tim Brashier Campus, Room 237, 405 Lancaster Ave, Greer, SC 29650, phone: 864-977-7256
Michelle Sabou, michelle.sabou@ngu.edu, Director of Personnel Services, First Floor, Donnan, phone: 864-977-7200
Jared Thomas, jared.thomas@ngu.edu, AVP Student Engagement, Tingle Student Life Center, First Floor, phone: 864-663-0148
By Mail:
North Greenville University
ATTN: Title IX Coordinator
405 Lancaster Ave
Greer, SC 29650
The Title IX Office reports to the Executive Vice President
Title IX Steering Committee
The Title IX Steering Committee assists the University Title IX
Coordinator with respect to the University’s Title IX compliance efforts
and provides the University with advice on promoting a campus culture
of respect and responsibility and in identifying and deploying effective
measures to prevent and address sexual misconduct.
The committee will assist the Title IX Coordinator to develop and
implement educational programs and initiatives designed to educate and
support administrators, faculty, staff, and students regarding their
rights and, where applicable, obligations under Title IX, including
reporting options/responsibilities, support services, University policy
and applicable disciplinary code, grievance procedures, Confidential
Resources, etc.
The steering committee will consist of at least one representative
from each of the following areas: Student Government, Athletics, Student
Engagement, Faculty (1 each from Greer and Tigerville), Security, and
HR; in addition, all Title IX Deputy Coordinators will serve on the
steering committee.
+ How to file a complaint
A complaint of discrimination and/or harassment may be filed by filling out the online complaint form at the following link:
SUBMIT A COMPLAINT If you are NOT an NGU student, faculty or staff, (or if your NGU credentials are not working for the above form) submit your complaint here.
Complaints may also be made in person, by mail, by email or by phone
to the Title IX Coordinator, Deputy Coordinator or any Officer with
Authority as identified in this policy OR by mail: North Greenville
University, ATTN: Title IX Coordinator, 405 Lancaster Ave., Greer, SC
29650
1. Complainants also have the option to notify law enforcement
- Greenville County Sheriff’s Office Dial 911
- Safety and Security – 864-977-7777
- Safety and Security can assist with reporting to Law Enforcement
2. The University offers Counseling Services. Community Resources include:
During any assessment and/or investigation, NGU will assist the
parties in accessing advocacy resources, academic support, counseling,
health or mental health services, and other security and support
measures as appropriate, including issuing a no-contact order, arranging
a change of living or work assignment or class schedules or making
adjustments for assignments or tests, etc.
RETALIATION
The University prohibits retaliation for reporting or participating
in the Complaint Resolution Process. Any individual who is subject to or
aware of possible retaliation or has other concerns regarding the
matter should report these concerns to the Title IX Coordinator, who
shall take appropriate action to address such conduct in a prompt and
equitable manner. A finding that a party has made retaliatory
statements or taken retaliatory actions will result in a separate
disciplinary action up to and including separation from the University.
HONESTY
The University prohibits any individual from knowingly making a false
material statement during the Complaint and Resolution Process. The
Title IX Coordinator will take appropriate action to address such
conduct in a prompt and equitable manner. A finding that a party has
knowingly made a false material statement(s) will result in a separate
disciplinary action up to and including separation from the University.
+ TITLE IX and Sex Discrimination complaints
The University encourages the reporting of all incidents involving
sexual misconduct, sex discrimination, sexual harassment, sexual
violence including sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence,
and stalking. If the University knows about an incident of
discrimination, harassment or sexual violence, the University will take
action designed to stop the misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and
address its effects. To be proactive, the University publishes a notice
of nondiscrimination and has adopted and published grievance
procedures. Reports may be made online:
SUBMIT A COMPLAINTBy mail: North Greenville University, ATTN: Title IX Coordinator, 405 Lancaster Ave., Greer, SC 29650 OR
In person, by email or by phone: to the Title IX Coordinator or any Official with Authority as outlined in this Policy above Complainants and other reporting individuals are encouraged to report
any violation of this policy as soon as possible in order to maximize
the University's ability to respond promptly and effectively. There is
no time limit for reporting. Reports under this policy may be made at
any time without regard to how much time has elapsed since the
incident(s) in question. As long as the Complainant or the Respondent
remain enrolled or employed by the University, a Complainant may choose
to report at any time.
SAFETY / RESOURCES
The first priority of a victim of sexual assault or domestic violence
is to get to a place of safety. This may mean simply getting away from
the location of the incident, calling 911 or seeking support from a
friend, Residence Life staff member or person with whom the victim is
comfortable. The following are some options for any victim.
- Call 911 for medical or safety emergency. Emergency Room – North Greenville Medical Campus, 807 N. Main St.
(Hwy 276), Travelers Rest, SC. OR Greer Memorial Hospital, 830 S.
Buncombe Road Greer, SC.
- Call Safety and Security 977-7777 for assistance and to help
coordinate emergency response efforts. See also the University’s Safety
and Security webpage.
- The victim’s well-being is of primary concern. If the incident
caused physical harm, the victim should seek medical attention
immediately. See the local healthcare facilities above. The victim
should also preserve any evidence of the incident and injuries as the
evidence may assist with the investigation and/or serve as proof of a
crime.
- The University encourages timely law enforcement reporting;
however, it is the victim's choice to make such a report or to decline
involvement with law enforcement. NGU Safety and Security can assist
the Complainant with filing the criminal report if the complainant
desires to do so.
- Seek support. Telling someone is the first step to healing and
will help the complainant re-establish control of the situation. The
University offers Counseling Services. Counseling or Confidential Resources include:
A Complainant or witness has many options, including seeking
counseling or assistance from a Confidential Resource, making a report
under this policy, and/or making a report to law enforcement. The
University recognizes that deciding among these options can be difficult
and is an intensely personal decision. Complainants and witnesses are
encouraged to explore all potential reporting and support options.
CONFIDENTIAL REPORTING
Confidential reporting refers only to the protections provided to
information disclosed in legally-protected or privileged relationships,
including licensed professional mental health counselors, licensed
medical professionals, and ordained clergy. These Confidential
Resources can engage in confidential communications when the information
is disclosed within the scope of the provision of professional
services. When an individual shares information with a Confidential
Resource (on campus or in the community) as a confidential communication
in the course of a protected relationship, the confidential resource
cannot disclose the information (including information about whether an
individual has received services) to any third party without the
individual's written permission or unless required by ethical or legal
obligations which compel the professional to reveal such information
(e.g., the law may permit disclosure when the individual gives written
consent for its disclosure, if there is an imminent concern that the
individual will likely cause serious physical harm to self or others, or
if the information concerns conduct involving suspected abuse or
neglect of a minor under the age of 18). A person’s medical and
counseling records are privileged and confidential documents.
Confidential Resources submit non-personally-identifying information
about Clery-reportable crimes to the Safety and Security for purposes of
the anonymous statistical reporting under the Clery Act.
In their professional capacity, NGU counselors in the Counseling
Services are considered Confidential Resources and are not required to
report according to University policy. Information disclosed in the
clinical setting will be considered confidential. However, Confidential
Resources may encourage clients to report to local and/or campus
authorities.
Note: Faculty, staff, administrators, and other employees, who
are otherwise involved in pastoral or ministry work, are licensed mental
health workers or are licensed medical workers, but who are not working
in that capacity for NGU, are NOT Confidential Resources.
The University will seek to keep confidential the identity of the
parties as well as the information obtained in a Title IX investigation
to the extent it is consistent with a full investigation of the
complaint. However, notification of “need to know” individuals
including, but not limited to, witnesses, supervisory/administrative
personnel and/or other University staff as may be necessary to carry out
interim measures, the investigation, and/or final disciplinary actions
may be necessary.
ANONYMOUS OR THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINTS
Where a Complainant requests to remain anonymous or that no formal
action be taken, the University will seek to honor the request. However,
the University must balance this with its obligations to provide a safe
and non-discriminatory environment for the community and to afford a
Respondent fundamental fairness by providing notice and an opportunity
to respond before any action is taken against a Respondent. In the event
that the circumstances of the complaint dictate a full investigation,
the University will take all actions necessary to conduct the
investigation while balancing the wishes of the Complainant. This may
include a limited disclosure of the identity of the Complainant and
other steps that might compromise the Complainant’s request for
confidentiality and anonymity.
Reports that are made anonymously or by third parties will be
investigated by the Title IX office. However, third party reporters do
not become Complainants under Title IX.
Title IX requires the University to investigate all incidents about
which the University knows in order to protect the health and safety of
the University community. The University will undertake an initial
assessment of all complaints filed even in cases where the alleged
complainant and/or Complainant choose not to cooperate or participate;
however, if the complainant chooses not to cooperate, the ability of the
Title IX office to investigate may be limited or not possible. As
necessary, the University reserves the right to initiate a complaint, to
serve as Complainant, and to initiate conduct proceedings without a
formal complaint by the alleged victim or Complainant.
AMNESTY FOR MISCONDUCT OF THE STUDENT COMPLAINANT
Students may be reluctant to report incidents because of concerns
that their own behavior may be a violation of University policies. The
University will not pursue disciplinary action against a student
Complainant or witness for disclosure of past personal consumption of
alcohol or other drugs where the disclosure is made in connection with a
good faith report or investigation of prohibited conduct under Title IX
and the personal consumption did not place the health or safety of any
other person at risk. Similarly, the University will not pursue
disciplinary action against a Complainant for past violations of the
Student Conduct Policy, including but not limited to with regard to
sexual activity, where the disclosure is made in connection with a good
faith report or investigation of prohibited conduct under Title IX. The
University reserves the right to revoke this amnesty if the University,
in its sole discretion, finds that the Complainant filed the complaint
in bad faith or in an attempt to deflect potential discipline for
violations of the Code of Student Conduct.
INITIAL ASSESSMENT
After the Title IX Coordinator and/or other OWA completes an initial
assessment of the complaint to determine jurisdiction, the Title IX
Coordinator (or a designee) will conduct an initial Title IX
assessment. The purpose of the assessment is to gain a basic
understanding of the nature and circumstances of the report; it is not
intended to be a full interview. The Title IX Office will gather
information about the reported conduct and respond to any immediate
health or safety concerns raised by the report. The Title IX Office
will assess the Complainant’s safety and well-being, offer the
University’s immediate support and assistance, and assess the nature and
circumstances of the report to determine whether the reported conduct
raises a potential policy violation and the appropriate manner of
resolution under this policy. Thereafter, an investigation may be
initiated depending on a variety of factors, such as whether the
Complainant will pursue disciplinary action, the nature of the
allegation, and the proper grievance process to be applied.
As part of the initial assessment, the Title IX Office will:
-
assess the nature and circumstances of the report, including whether it
provides the names and/or any other information that identifies the
Complainant, the Respondent, any witness, and/or any other individual
with knowledge of the reported incident.
- address immediate physical safety and emotional well-being.
- notify the Complainant of their right to contact (or decline to contact) law enforcement or seek a civil protection order.
- notify the Complainant of the right to seek medical treatment.
- notify the Complainant of the importance of preservation of evidence.
- provide the Complainant with written information about on and off campus resources.
- notify the Complainant of the range of interim measures available,
including the right to reasonable interim remedial measures regardless
whether they choose to participate in a University or law enforcement
investigation.
- refer the report to Safety and Security to enter the report into the University’s crime log if required by the Clery Act.
- with the Campus Security, assess the reported conduct and discern the need for a timely warning under the Clery Act.
- notify the Complainant of the right to be accompanied at any meeting by an advisor of choice.
- assess for any alleged pattern of conduct by Respondent.
- discuss the Complainant’s expressed preference for manner of
resolution and any barriers to proceeding (e.g., confidentiality
concerns).
- explain the University’s policy prohibiting retaliation, that the
University will take prompt action when retaliation is reported, and how
to report acts of retaliation.
- determine age of the Complainant, and if the Complainant is a minor, make the appropriate notifications under SC law.
At the conclusion of the initial assessment, the University will proceed with one of the following options:
-
Issue a notice of allegation to the Respondent and proceed with a formal
investigation under the Title IX process. This will occur when a
Student Complainant requests an investigation, where the Complainant is a
student and the Respondent is an employee of the University, and/or
where the Title IX Coordinator determines that the safety and wellbeing
of the University community necessitates an investigation even when a
Complainant requests that no investigation be pursued or where Informal
Resolution is not appropriate or available.
- When the Title IX Coordinator receives a complaint by an employee of
the University that another member of the faculty, staff or
administration has violated this policy, the Title IX Coordinator will
work with Human Resources to investigate in a manner consistent with
University personnel policies and all applicable law. The Title IX
Coordinator will have the authority to exercise oversight of the
investigation and resolution and will ensure that the procedures
followed are consistent with the requirements of Title IX and VAWA and
the principles set forth in this policy. In extraordinary cases, the
Title IX Coordinator may employ the services of an outside Investigator
to conduct the investigation of the claim against a faculty, staff, or
administrator.
- Issue a notice of allegation to the Respondent and proceed with
Informal Resolution. This will always require the consent of all
parties. Any party may withdraw his/her consent to informal resolution
at any time prior to an agreement. If consent is withdrawn, the Title
IX office will proceed with a formal investigation.
- If outside the scope of the Title IX jurisdiction, dismiss the
complaint and refer the matter to the appropriate office or department
for resolution under the relevant policy. Any dismissal of the
complaint may be appealed by either party.
INTERIM MEASURES
At any time during the process, the Title IX Coordinator (or a
designee) may impose reasonable and appropriate interim measures
designed to support the parties involved. Interim Measures are not
disciplinary and may be imposed regardless of whether discipline or
corrective measures are sought by the Complainant or the University.
This action assumes no presumption or determination of guilt and the
investigation will be completed as soon as possible.
All individuals are encouraged to report concerns about the failure
of another individual to abide by any restrictions imposed by an Interim
Measure. The University will take responsive action to enforce the
Interim Measures.
At any time during the investigation, NGU may implement any one or more of the following Interim Measures:
-
place an employee on paid or unpaid administrative leave
- remove a student from campus, housing, and/or current classes
- provide access to counseling services
- issue on-campus No Contact Orders
- modify course schedules, rescheduling of exams and assignments
- limit on time and access to campus (including reduced access to the library, cafeteria, and other University buildings)
- ban individuals from campus except for classes and required University activities
- change class schedules, work schedules or job assignments
- voluntary leave of absence
- provide an escort to ensure safe movement between classes and activities
- University imposed leave or separation
- any other remedy tailored to the involved individuals to achieve the goals of this Policy
The University may use these Interim Measures in any combination thereof
or create new measures as needed. The University will take responsive
action to enforce the Interim Measures.
INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS
The University has adopted an investigative process that is a consistent, equitable and transparent.
The parties will have equal access to the process, including but not
limited to the right to offer and rebut any evidence to be included in
the investigative report. There
is no presumption of responsibility for the conduct alleged until a
determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the
adjudication of the complaint. The investigators and adjudicators will serve impartially, without conflict, and make no prejudgments of the facts at issue.
ADVISORS
Both
the Complainant and the Respondent have the right to be accompanied by
an advisor of their choice to any meeting. The Advisor’s role is limited
to a role of support during the process. The Advisor’s role of support
is at the sole discretion of Complainant and/or Respondent. If the
complaint proceeds to a formal adjudication, an Advisor is required for
the live hearing. If the party
has not chosen an advisor prior to the live hearing, the University will
provide an Advisor to the party for the purposes of the live hearing.
TIMEFRAME FOR INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION
The
University will seek to complete the investigation and resolution
process in approximately 90 calendar days following the issuance of the
notice of the allegations (exclusive of appeal).
The University may extend any timeframe in this policy, including
extension beyond 90 calendar days for resolution of an investigation. An
extension may be required to ensure the integrity and thoroughness of
the investigation; to comply with a request by law enforcement; in
response to the unavailability of the parties or witnesses; or for other
legitimate reasons, such as intervening breaks in the University
calendar, University finals periods, special events on campus, the
complexity of the investigation, the volume of information or length of
the written record, and/or the severity and extent of the alleged
misconduct. While requests for
delays by the parties may be considered, the University cannot unduly or
unreasonably delay the prompt resolution of a report under this policy.
Reasonable requests for delays by the parties will serve to extend the
90 calendar day time period for resolution of the report.
The Title IX Coordinator, in consultation with the investigator, has
the sole discretion and authority to determine whether an extension is
required or warranted by the circumstances.
Although
cooperation with law enforcement may necessitate the University to
suspend the fact-finding portion of a Title IX investigation
temporarily, the University will resume its investigation as soon as
practical given all the circumstances, including the status of criminal
proceedings. The University
will not, however, wait for the conclusion of a criminal proceeding to
begin its own investigation, and if needed, will take immediate steps to
provide appropriate interim remedial measures for the Complainant.
CONSOLIDATION OF INVESTIGATIONS
The
Title IX Office has the discretion to consolidate multiple reports into
a single investigation if evidence relevant to one incident might be
relevant to the others.
Consolidation might involve multiple Complainants and a single
Respondent, multiple Respondents, or conduct that is temporally or
logically connected.
The investigator may also investigate other forms
of conduct that would be a potential violation of other University
policies, and those forms of conduct may be resolved under this policy,
as determined at the discretion of the Title IX Office.
PRIVACY
The
University will seek to keep confidential the information obtained in a
Title IX investigation to the extent it is consistent with a full
investigation of the complaint.
However, notification of “need to know” individuals including, but not
limited to, witnesses, supervisory/administrative personnel and/or other
University staff may be necessary to carry out interim measures, the
investigation, and/or final disciplinary actions.
Individuals involved in investigations or disciplinary proceedings
under this policy are encouraged and instructed to exercise discretion
in sharing information in order to safeguard the integrity of the
process and to avoid all appearances of retaliation.
While discretion regarding the process is important, Complainants and
Respondents are not restricted from discussing and sharing information
with others who may support or assist them during the process.
All parties, however, are required to maintain the privacy of
FERPA-protected information and are also requested to maintain private
sensitive information gathered or learned in the process.
Individuals who disclose private information with the intention of
intimidating, embarrassing, harassing, or retaliating will be subject to
disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment
and/or expulsion from the University.
PRIVILEGED INFORMATION
The
University will not use, seek to obtain, permit questions about or
allow the introduction of evidence of any information protected by a
legal privilege, such as attorney-client or the doctor-patient
privilege. Individuals may
waive his/her privilege in order to allow the introduction of the
evidence; however, any such waiver must be in writing and must be
voluntary.
RECORDING OF INTERVIEW(S)
No
person shall record a Title IX interview and/or meeting, whether
conducted by phone or in person, with the Complainant, Respondent or any
witness, without the express consent of all parties. This applies to all participants in the interview including the Witness, Investigator, Complainant and Respondent. Any violation of this policy is subject to disciplinary action, up to and including discharge and/or expulsion. This prohibition does not include the recording of an interview with the express permission of ALL participants.
COOPERATION WITH INVESTIGATION
The
University understands that a witness may be reluctant to participate
in an investigation; however, all members of the administration, faculty
and/or staff, as well as students, are expected to cooperate with any
investigation. Any employee who refuses to cooperate in an investigation may be subject to discipline.
Refusal to cooperate includes, but is not limited to, delaying or
failing to acknowledge requests from University officials for
information, delaying or failing to make oneself available for meetings
with University officials, and/or providing information to University
officials that the individual knows or reasonably should have known to
be untruthful.
If
a Complainant or Respondent chooses not to answer any or all questions
in an investigation for any reason, the University will continue its
process, and the University will issue any discipline or sanctions, as
appropriate. The University
will not draw any adverse inference from a Complainant’s or Respondent’s
decision not to participate in the investigation or any form of
resolution under this policy; however, the Complainant or Respondent
should be aware that declining to participate in the investigation may
impact the timing and outcome of the case.
At
any time, the University may place an administrative hold on the
Respondent's University transcript, make a transcript notification or
defer or withhold the award of the Respondent's degree.
Although a Respondent may withdraw from the University while the
investigation is pending, this withdrawal may be considered permanent
and the Respondent’s transcript will be noted withdrawal pending
investigation.
INFORMAL RESOLUTION
The University provides an informal resolution process when both parties desire to resolve the situation cooperatively.
Informal resolution may include inquiries into the facts, but does not
rise to the level of a formal investigation unless required by
applicable law. The informal process, which is overseen by the Title IX
Coordinator or a Deputy Coordinator, is designed to resolve complaints
quickly, efficiently, and to the mutual satisfaction of all parties
involved. Where circumstances allow, the informal process will be initiated as soon as possible after the filing of the formal complaint.
Informal resolution may include, but is not limited to, options such as
meeting informally with the Complainant and the Respondent (individual
or group representative) with the intent of bringing about resolution,
meeting privately with the Respondent and acting as intercessor,
targeted or broad-based educational programming or training, supported
direct conversation or interaction with the Respondent, and/or indirect
action by the Title IX Office. A party may withdraw his/her consent to
informal resolution at any time prior to the resolution of the
complaint. If consent is withdrawn, the matter will be referred back to
the formal resolution process.
Consent for the informal resolution process cannot be withdrawn
retroactively by a party after a resolution has been agreed upon by all
parties.
The University
will not compel any party to engage in an informal resolution, to
confront the other directly, or to participate in any particular form of
Informal Resolution. The
recommendation to pursue Informal Resolution will be made when the
University has sufficient information about the nature and scope of the
conduct, which may occur at any time. Either party may request Informal
Resolution, but participation in Informal Resolution is voluntary and
must be agreed to by all parties in writing.
PROCEDURES
A
Title IX investigation is an administrative and academic proceeding,
and therefore, is not subject to the same requirements as those for a
proceeding in a criminal or civil legal hearing.
The parties will be treated equitably and have equal access to the
process, including, but not limited to, the right to offer and rebut any
evidence to be included in the investigative report.
There is no presumption of responsibility for the conduct alleged until
a determination regarding responsibility is made at the adjudication of
the complaint. The investigators and adjudicators will serve impartially, without conflict, and make no prejudgments of the facts at issue.
1. Evidence.
During an investigation, the investigator will seek to meet separately
with the Complainant, Respondent, and relevant witnesses. The Complainant and the Respondent have the right to be accompanied by an advisor of his/her choosing for any meeting. Witnesses may not participate solely to speak about an individual’s character.
The investigator will also gather other relevant information or
evidence, including documents, photographs, communications between the
parties, medical records (subject to the consent of the applicable
person), and other electronic records as appropriate.
The investigator, not the parties, is responsible for gathering relevant evidence to the extent reasonably possible.
Both Complainant and Respondent are encouraged, however, to submit any
information they believe may be relevant, and both the Complainant and
Respondent will be asked to identify witnesses and provide other
relevant information, such as documents, communications, photographs,
and other evidence. Both parties are encouraged to provide all relevant information as promptly as possible to facilitate prompt resolution.
In the event that a party declines voluntarily to provide material
information, the University’s ability to conduct a prompt, thorough, and
equitable investigation may be impacted.
The
investigator may also consider information publicly available from
social media or other online sources that comes to the attention of
investigator. The Title IX
Office does not actively monitor social media or online sources,
however, and as with all potentially relevant information, the
Complainant, Respondent or witness should bring online information to
the attention of the investigator.
Similarly,
the parties should bring any new or evolving evidence, such as
harassing or retaliatory conduct, to the attention of the investigator.
The investigator may consider such information in the investigation and
will also share any information about retaliation or violation of the
terms of an interim protective measure with the Title IX Coordinator for
independent disciplinary action.
In
general, a person’s medical and counseling records are confidential and
not accessible to the investigator unless the person voluntarily
chooses to share those records with the investigator. In those instances, the relevant information from the records must be shared with the other party.
Prior
or subsequent conduct substantially similar to the alleged conduct may
be considered in determining pattern, knowledge, intent, motive or
absence of mistake. The determination of relevance of pattern evidence
will be based on an assessment of whether the previous or subsequent
conduct was substantially similar to the conduct under investigation or
indicates a pattern of similar prohibited conduct.
2.Coordination with Law Enforcement.
If there is a concurrent criminal investigation, the University will
contact the law enforcement agency that is conducting any investigation
to inform that agency that a University investigation is also in
progress to attempt to ascertain the status of the criminal
investigation and to determine the extent to which any evidence
collected by law enforcement may be available to the University in its
investigation.
3. Preliminary Investigative Report.
At the conclusion of the fact-gathering investigation, the investigator
will notify the parties that his/her investigation has concluded.
The preliminary investigative report and accompanying documents, if
any, will be made available to the Complainant and the Respondent to
review. The Investigator’s file and notes will not be available for the review by either party.
Upon review of the preliminary investigative report, each party will
have ten (10) days to (1) provide written comment or feedback on the
facts as gathered, (2) submit additional information, and/or (3)
identify additional witnesses or request the collection of other
information by the investigator.
If either party provides a written response or provides additional
information, the content will be shared with the other party and
incorporated as appropriate in the final investigative report.
4. Final Investigative Report.
Within ten (10) days after receipt of or expiration of time for
additional comments from the parties, the investigator will prepare a
final investigative report that in addition to the preliminary report,
will include a determination as to credibility of the parties and
witnesses as well as any recommendations of the Investigator.
5. Impact and Mitigation Statements.
Either or both parties may submit a statement to the Title IX
Coordinator for consideration by the Adjudication Panel in determining
whether a Title IX violation occurred and/or an appropriate sanction.
The Complainant may submit a written statement describing the impact of
the prohibited conduct on the Complainant and/or expressing a
preference about the sanction(s) to be imposed.
The Respondent may submit a written statement explaining any factors
that the Respondent believes should mitigate or otherwise be considered
in determining the disciplinary action(s) imposed.
Any impact or mitigation statement should be submitted no later than
five (5) business days after receipt of the Preliminary Investigative
Report. The Title IX Investigator will provide any statement(s) with the
final investigative report to the Adjudication Panel.
Adjudication of Complaint
Informal
resolutions mutually agreed upon by the parties will be subject to the
review and approval of the Title IX Coordinator to ensure that any
issues related to the overall campus safety and security have been
addressed.
Complaints
which follow the formal resolution process will proceed to an
adjudication panel upon completion of the Investigative Report.
The Final Investigative Report along with all underlying evidence and
documentation; any written response by the parties; and any
impact/mitigation statements will be submitted to the Title IX
Adjudication Panel. All evidence submitted to the Panel must have been previously submitted to the parties for their review and response.
Both the Complainant and the Respondent have a right to be present at the hearing.
In most circumstances, the hearing will be held virtually with each
party in separate rooms so that the hearing does not require physical
proximity to the other party.
Although, as a general rule, the University will expect the Complainant
and Respondent to be present at the in-person hearing, the Panel may
proceed without the presence of one or both parties if the safety and
health of the community necessitates it. Each party must have an advisor
at the hearing, if a party has not chosen an advisor, the University
will provide an advisor for him/her.
Each party will have the opportunity to be heard and to respond to any questions of the Panel.
The parties may not directly question one another, although they may
proffer questions for the opposing party or any witness to the Panel who
will determine the relevance of the question.
If the Panel determines that the question is relevant, the advisor for
the party may ask the opposing party or witness said question. All questions and follow-up questions must be approved by the panel prior to the advisor asking the question. The parties will have the opportunity to submit questions for pre-approval prior to the hearing if they choose to do so. Pre-approved questions are not disclosed to the other party prior to the hearing.
If a party wishes to call or cross-examination any witness during the
live hearing, the party must submit the name of the witness to the Title
IX Coordinator via email at least seven (7) days prior to the date of
the hearing in order to coordinate the attendance of that witness at the
hearing. The parties will not
be allowed to call witnesses or present witnesses whose names have not
been submitted in advance of the hearing. All witnesses should be disclosed to the investigator during the investigation.
The Parties do not have the right to be present during the deliberation of the Panel.
The Panel will review all evidence and will determine by a majority
vote whether there is sufficient evidence to support by a preponderance
of the evidence a finding that the Respondent violated this policy.
COMPOSITION OF ADJUDICATION PANEL
The Adjudication Panel will be appointed by the Title IX Coordinator from a pre-approved list of trained Title IX Adjudicators.
If a Panel member has a conflict of interest upon revealing the names
of the parties, the Title IX Coordinator will appoint a substitute panel
member from the list of Title IX Adjudicators.
STANDARD OF PROOF
The
Adjudication Panel will make a finding, by a preponderance of the
evidence, whether there is sufficient evidence to support a policy
violation. A finding of
responsibility based on a preponderance of evidence means that based on
all relevant evidence and reasonable inferences from the evidence, the
greater weight of information indicates that it was more likely than not
the policy violation occurred.
The University’s definition of sexual misconduct is broader than that
required by law; therefore, a finding of no violation under Title IX
does not preclude a finding that there has been a violation of other
laws and/or the University’s code of conduct.
It
is the policy of North Greenville University to prohibit sexual
discrimination and harassment of its employees and students in any form.
In maintaining this policy, the University seeks to assert basic
Christian precepts that requires a higher standard of conduct for the
employee and/or student than that required by the law.
The evidence submitted during a Title IX investigation and adjudication
may be used, in additional to any other evidence deemed relevant, by
the University in a determination whether other laws or University codes
of conduct were violated. The
finding of no violation under Title IX does not insulate the party from
discipline for a violation of another law or the University code of
conduct.
RULING
Decisions of the Adjudication Panel will be made by a majority vote.
If the Adjudication Panel determines that there is a policy violation,
the Panel will then determine the appropriate disciplinary action(s) for
the prohibited conduct. If the
Panel determines that there was insufficient evidence to support a
finding that the Respondent violated this policy, the matter will be
dismissed for Title IX purposes.
However, appropriate remedial measures (including, but not limited to,
no contact directives issued to both parties) may remain in effect to
support a party. Other remedial
measures (including, but not limited to, education, training, etc) may
also be recommended by the Panel to the Title IX Coordinator for
training, education, etc, for areas of the University community which
the investigation revealed may benefit from further training and
education.
Written notice of
the outcome and/or disciplinary action(s) will be provided to the
Parties typically within ten (10) days of the hearing.
APPEAL
A party may appeal the Ruling of the Adjudication Panel on one or more of the following grounds:
(1) there was a procedural error that materially impacted the outcome,
(2) there is new information not reasonably known at the time of the
hearing which could materially impact the decision, or 3) a conflict of
interest on the part of the investigator and/or Adjudication Panel.
To appeal the finding, the Complainant or Respondent must submit a
written statement to the Title IX Coordinator within ten (10) days of
the receipt of the Ruling explaining why the party contests the
finding(s). Each party will
have the opportunity to review and respond in writing to the other
party’s request for an appeal of the ruling; any response must be
submitted within ten (10) days of receipt of the other party’s written
statement of appeal. The Appeal
Officer will review the written statement(s) and determine, in its sole
discretion, whether a review of the ruling is appropriate.
If neither party appeals within the timeframe given, the Ruling becomes final.
If
any ground is substantiated, the Appeal Officer may overturn the ruling
and/or remand the matter to the Investigator (or a new investigator)
with instructions for further investigation or other action.
The instructions may include guidance regarding the scope of
information to be further investigated and any appropriate stipulations,
including the appointment of a new investigator.
If the Appeal Officer affirms a Ruling, the matter will be considered resolved, and the case will be closed.
Appropriate remedial measures (including, but not limited to, no
contact directives issued to both parties) may, however, remain in
effect to support a party even where no violation was found.
Written notice of the Appeal decision will be sent to both parties.
EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE APPEAL
The
University recognizes that under extraordinary circumstances, a
Complainant or Respondent may identify newly discovered and dispositive
information, at some point after the expiration of the appeal period,
that was not previously available during the original complaint through
the exercise of due diligence. The Title IX Coordinator or designee has
the discretion to review this information.
If it is determined that the information could not reasonably have been
discovered prior to the resolution of the case, the information would
substantially affect the finding or sanction, and compelling
justification exists for its consideration, the Title IX Coordinator may
review the case or outcome, and refer the matter for additional action
in furtherance of this policy.
IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY ACTION(S)
Where there is a finding of responsibility, the Adjudication Panel may impose one or more disciplinary action(s).
Disciplinary action(s) may include any, or any combination of, the
disciplinary action(s) that are listed below or set forth in the
University’s Faculty/Staff Handbook and/or Student Conduct Code.
The policy prohibits a broad range of conduct, all of which is serious in nature.
In keeping with the University’s commitment to foster a Christ-centered
educational environment that is safe and free from discrimination and
harassment, the Adjudication Panel has great latitude in the imposition
of disciplinary action(s) tailored to the facts and circumstances of
each report, including but not limited to, the impact of the conduct on
the Complainant and surrounding community, the Respondent’s history, and
accountability for the Respondent.
Disciplinary action(s) are designed to eliminate prohibited conduct,
prevent its recurrence, and remedy its effects, while supporting the
University’s Christian educational mission and federal obligations.
Disciplinary action(s) may include educational, restorative,
rehabilitative, and punitive components.
Some conduct, however, is so egregious in nature, harmful to the
individuals involved or so deleterious to the Christian educational
process, that it requires severe disciplinary action(s), including
suspension, expulsion, and/or termination of employment.
The
Adjudication Panel may solicit information from the Complainant, the
Respondent, and any other administrator who can provide information
relevant to a determination regarding potential disciplinary action(s). The Adjudication Panel may also review any written impact or mitigation statement submitted by the Complainant or Respondent.
Disciplinary Sanctions when the Respondent is a Student
Disciplinary action(s) may be imposed individually or in combination. For violations of this policy, the following disciplinary action(s) may be imposed:
Accountability & Mentoring:
Students will be assigned to a member of the university faculty or
staff for accountability and mentorship. This person is assigned by the
Associate Vice President of Student Engagement, and will provide regular
updates to the Office of Student Accountability.
Education or Observation Hours:
Students will be required to attend support groups, seminars, lectures,
or classes. On-line courses may also be mandatory. Students issued
education/observation hours are required to provide a written summary of
their time to the Office of Student Accountability.
Fine:
Students will be charged a monetary fine. Fines will be imposed in
conjunction with other sanctions. Fines may vary based on offense and
prior disciplinary record. The maximum fine for any violation is $800.
North Greenville University institutional financial aid cannot be used
to pay a disciplinary fine.
No Contact Order:
A “No Contact Order” means a student must make all reasonable effort to
avoid any contact with a particular member of the university community.
Contact is defined as, but not limited to, close proximity to, contact
through other members of the university community or outside persons, or
contact via any digital or social media platform. This sanction is
applied to on campus and off campus situations. Further details will be
provided to the persons involved when the specific no contact order is
drafted.
On or Off Campus Counseling:
Students will be required to attend counseling sessions. The counselor,
in contract with the student, will determine the number of counseling
sessions appropriate for the student. Counseling is confidential under
guidelines given by the counselor. In compliance with counseling
confidentiality, a report of satisfactory completion of counseling will
be issued to the Office of Student Accountability.
Parent/Guardian
Notification: Students will be issued this sanction at the discretion
of the Associate Vice President of Student Engagement. Parents or
guardians will always be notified of withdrawal, suspension, or
expulsion.
Restrictions:
Students’ campus activities, amenities, and/or movements will be
restricted. When appropriate in cases involving behavioral misconduct
between members of the community, restrictions may be placed on access
to space and/or resources or on participation in activities so as to
limit opportunities for contact between the parties.
Restitution:
Students will be required to reimburse the university or community
member for damage to and/or misappropriation of property.
Residency Relocation:
When appropriate to the infraction, relocation within University
housing may be added to any of the other penalties listed above except
warning.
Residency
Termination: Students are issued a residency termination when they are
ineligible to live in university housing, but allowed to remain a
student.
Expulsion: Students
assigned an expulsion status will be expelled and not allowed to return
to any university campus or attend any event sponsored by the
university without prior written consent from the Associate Vice
President of Student Engagement.
Disciplinary Notice: A
disciplinary notice serves as a warning for students. Students who
continue to violate university policies will be subject to further
sanctions and increased status level.
Disciplinary Withdrawal:
Students assigned a disciplinary withdrawal have egregiously violated
the policies of the university. Disciplinary withdrawal serves as a
temporary expulsion. Students will not be allowed to return to any
university campus or attend any event sponsored by the university
without prior written consent from the Associate Vice President of
Student Engagement. Students must follow guidelines given by the Office
of Student Accountability for readmittance. Two (2) disciplinary
withdrawals will result in final expulsion. Students assigned a
disciplinary withdrawal from the university, even for a short period of
time, may face additional consequences in other areas, such as:
- Tuition, residence hall costs, and fees (suspension does not forgive financial obligations)
- Student financial aid (including state funded scholarships)
- Athletic participation and eligibility
- University Housing and Meal Plan
- Use of campus resources and access to campus
- Immigration status for international students
- Status and benefits of veterans and dependents of veterans
- Academics
Out of Good Standing: Students
out of good standing are prohibited from actively participating in
extra-curricular activities, unless required to fulfill an academic
requirement. Leadership positions in any club, organization, or team
will be forfeited. It is up to university officials if students are
allowed to return to prior leadership positions. Students are ineligible
for awards while out of good standing. Additional Remedies: Regardless
of the outcome, the Adjudication Panel may recommend additional
remedies to address the effects of the conduct, restore the individual’s
access to University programs and activities, and restore, to the
extent possible, benefits and opportunities lost as a result of the
prohibited conduct. The Adjudication Panel may also identify remedies to address the effects of the conduct on the University community. Extended protective measures may be included in the disciplinary action(s).
Disciplinary Sanctions when the Respondent is an employee
Disciplinary action(s) may be imposed individually or in combination. For violations of this policy, the following disciplinary action(s) may be imposed upon any faculty, staff, or administrator:
- counseling or training
- reprimand
- written warning
- probation
- suspension
- suspension with conditions
- financial penalty
- unpaid leave of absence
- demotion
- reassignment of duties
- termination of employment
Disciplinary
action(s) will be determined based on the seriousness of the misconduct
and on the individual's prior disciplinary history, if any.
The findings of fact and responsibility, and in cases when violations
of University policy occurred, any sanctions will be communicated to the
parties in writing by the Title IX Adjudication panel. The notification will include the parties' rights of appeal. In all cases involving sex discrimination or sexual misconduct, the file will be archived by the Title IX Coordinator.
Additional Remedies:
Regardless of the outcome, the Adjudication Panel may recommend
additional remedies for the Complainant to address the effects of the
conduct on the Complainant, restore the Complainant’s access to
University programs and activities, and restore to the Complainant, to
the extent possible, benefits and opportunities lost as a result of the
prohibited conduct. The Adjudication Panel may also identify remedies to address the effects of the conduct on the University community. Extended protective measures may be included in the disciplinary action(s).
Violations of Law and other codes of conduct
Conduct
that violates this policy also may violate the laws of the local
jurisdiction in which the incident occurred and subject a Respondent to
criminal prosecution by the presiding authority. Conduct that violates this policy also may subject a Respondent to civil liability.
It
is the policy of North Greenville University to prohibit sexual
discrimination and harassment of its employees and students in any form.
In maintaining this policy, the University seeks to assert basic
Christian precepts that requires a higher standard of conduct for the
employee and/or student than that required by the law.
The evidence submitted during a Title IX investigation and adjudication
may be used, in additional to any other evidence deemed relevant, by
the University in a determination whether other laws or University codes
of conduct were violated. The
finding of no violation under Title IX does not insulate the party from
discipline for a violation of another law or the University code of
conduct.
Notice of Outcome
Both
the Complainant and Respondent will receive a written notice of outcome
that documents the Adjudication Panel’s ruling and discipline, as well
as the decision of the Review Officer, if appealed. The determination of the Adjudication Panel is final unless appealed by one of the parties.
The
Title IX Office will also notify relevant administrative and academic
units, including but not limited to the Financial Aid Office, the
Registrar, Academic Administration, Human Resources, the Safety and
Security office, and Student Engagement, as appropriate and necessary,
to ensure that disciplinary action(s) and remedies are put into effect
immediately.
The
Title IX Coordinator will maintain records of all reports, Disciplinary
Resolution, Informal Resolution, and steps taken to eliminate
prohibited conduct, prevent its recurrence, and address its effects. Findings of responsibility may also be included in a student’s disciplinary record and/or an employee’s personnel file.
+ Prevention and Awareness Programs
As
a community, we share the responsibility to prevent sexual misconduct
through education, bystander intervention, and mutual respect for one
another. As part of our commitment to the prevention of sexual
misconduct, the University offers education and awareness programs.
Incoming students and new employees receive primary prevention and
awareness programming, and returning students and current employees
receive ongoing training and related programs.
The University provides coordinated programming and training through
multiple areas, including the Title IX Office, Student Engagement,
Safety and Security, Human Resources, the Provost’s Office, Counseling
Center, and other University departments.
+ Policy review and revision
This policy is maintained by the Title IX Office.
The University will review this policy on at least an annual basis and
may modify this policy after any such a review even if during an
academic year. The review will
capture evolving legal requirements and procedures, evaluate the
supports and resources available to the parties, and assess the
effectiveness of the resolution process (including as to the fairness of
the process, the time needed to complete the process, and the
disciplinary action(s) and remedies imposed).
The review will include the opportunity for individuals affected by the
policy to provide feedback and will incorporate an aggregate view of
reports, resolution, and climate.
+ Definitions
1. Advisor is
an individual chosen by the Complainant or Respondent to provide
support throughout the Title IX Complaint Resolution Process.
The Advisor’s role is limited to a role of support during the process.
The Advisor’s role of support is at the sole discretion of Complainant
and/or Respondent. If the complaint proceeds to a formal investigation,
an Advisor is required for the live hearing.
If the party has not chosen an advisor prior to the live hearing, the
University will provide an Advisor to the party for the purposes of the
live hearing.
2. Coercion
is the practice of forcing another party to act in an involuntary
manner by use of intimidation or threats or some other form of pressure
or force. Coercion may include the use of emotional manipulation to
persuade someone to do something the person may not want to do. Being
coerced into having sex or performing sexual acts is not consenting sex
and such conduct is considered Sexual Misconduct.
3. Consent is informed.
Consent is an affirmative, unambiguous, and conscious decision by each
participant to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity.
Consent is voluntary. It must be given without coercion, force, threats or intimidation.
Consent means the communication of an affirmative, conscious and freely
made decision by each participant to engage in agreed upon forms of
sexual activity.
Consent is revocable. Consent to some form of sexual activity
does not imply consent to other forms of sexual activity. Consent to
sexual activity on one occasion is not consent to engage in sexual
activity on another occasion. A current or previous dating or sexual
relationship, by itself, is not sufficient to constitute consent. Even
in the context of a relationship, there must be mutual consent to engage
in sexual activity. Consent can be revoked at any time. Once consent
is withdrawn, the sexual activity must stop immediately.
Consent cannot be given when a person is incapacitated. A
person cannot consent if he or she is unconscious or coming in and out
of consciousness. A person cannot consent if he or she is under the
threat of violence, bodily injury or other forms of coercion. A person
cannot consent if his or her understanding of the act is affected by a
physical or mental impairment. A person cannot consent if he or she is
under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
4. Dating Violence
is violence, including but not limited to sexual or physical abuse or
the threat of such abuse, committed by a person who is or has been in a
social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim and
where the existence of such a relationship will be determined based on a
consideration of the following factors: 1) the length of the
relationship, 2) the type of relationship, and 3) the frequency of
interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.
5. Domestic Violence
is defined as abuse committed against an adult or a minor who is a
spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant or person with whom
the suspect has had a child or is having or has had a dating or
engagement relationship.
6. Force is the use of physical violence and/or imposing on
someone physically to gain sexual access. Force also includes threats,
intimidation, and coercion that overcomes resistance or produces
consent.
7. Officers with Authority include those University employees who have the authority to redress prohibited misconduct under Title IX.
These employees include the Title IX Coordinator, the Deputy
Coordinators, the AVP of Student Engagement, and the VP of Human
Resources. Other employees may be required by the University to report
any known allegations of a Title IX violation; however, they are not
authorized by the University to resolve or redress sexual misconduct on
behalf of the University.
8. Rape
is forced sexual intercourse that is perpetrated against the will of a
person or when the person is unable to give consent (i.e., unconscious,
asleep, or under the influence of alcohol or drugs) and may involve
physical violence, coercion or the threat of harm to the individual.
9. Retaliation
is when action is taken against a Complainant or participant in the
complaint process that (i) adversely affects the individual’s employment
or academic status; and (ii) is motivated in whole or in part by the
individual’s participation in the complaint process.
10. Sexual Assault
includes physical sexual acts perpetrated against a person’s will or
where a person is incapable of giving consent due to the victim’s mental
or physical incapacitation.
The conduct may include physical force, violence, threat or
intimidation, duress, menace or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily
injury on the person or another.
11. Sexual Exploitation refers to a situation in which a
person takes or attempts to take non-consensual or abusive sexual
advantage of another. Examples of sexual exploitation include, but are
not limited to:
Sexual voyeurism (such as watching a person undressing or using the bathroom without the consent of the person observed); and
Taking
pictures, video, or audio recording another in a sexual act or in any
other private activity without the consent of all involved in the
activity or exceeding the boundaries of consent (such as allowing
another person to hide in a closet and observe sexual activity or
disseminating sexual pictures without the photographed person’s
consent).
12. Sexual Harassment is
a form of sex discrimination and includes unwelcome sexual advances,
requests for sexual favors or other verbal or physical conduct of a
sexual nature, on or off campus, when: 1) submission to such conduct is
made either explicitly or implicitly a condition of an individual's
employment or academic standing or progress; or 2) submission to or
rejection of such conduct is used as the basis for employment decisions
or for academic evaluation, grades or advancement; or 3) such conduct is
so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive that it denies a person
equal education access or 4) any instance of sexual assault, dating
violence, domestic violence, or stalking.
Sexual
Harassment, for purposes of Title VII, also includes any such conduct
that has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an
individual's work or academic performance or creating an intimidating or
hostile academic or work environment. Sexual harassment may take many
forms. Sexual harassment may consist of repeated actions or may even
arise from a single incident if sufficiently extreme.
Sexual
harassment may include incidents between any members of the University
community, including faculty and other academic appointees,
administrators, staff, student employees, students, interns, and
non-student or non-employee participants in University programs (e.g.,
vendors, contractors, or visitors).
Sexual harassment may occur in hierarchical relationships, between
peers or between individuals of the same sex or opposite sex.
Examples of sexual harassment include, but are not limited to: subtle
or persistent pressure for sexual activity; unnecessary touching,
pinching or brushing against a person; requesting or demanding sexual
favors concerning employment, academic activities or other University
activities; unwelcome communications (verbal, written, electronic, etc.)
of a sexual nature; failure to accept the termination of a consensual
relationship with repeated and persistent requests and behavior.
Sexual Misconduct is
a broad, non-legal term encompassing a range of non-consensual sexual
activity or unwelcome behavior of a sexual nature or other inappropriate
sexual behavior as determined by the University.
This term can include sexual assault, sexual exploitation, sexual
intimidation, sexual harassment, domestic violence, dating violence, and
stalking. However, this term
also includes conduct of a sexual nature which may not rise to the level
above but is conduct that as a Christian higher education institution,
the University determines, in its sole discretion, is inappropriate
based upon the teaching and ethical standards drawn from Scripture.
Using this term serves to differentiate the University standards of
conduct, which are biblically based, administrative and educational,
from the criminal and civil justice systems in which people are charged
with crimes that carry criminal penalty or found liable for civil
violations. The University may
find that a person has committed misconduct under the University student
or faculty/staff code of conduct even though the legal standard may not
hold them accountable.
14. Stalking
includes a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would
cause a reasonable person to: 1) fear for his or her safety or the
safety of others; or 2) suffer substantial emotional distress.
Such behaviors or activities may include, but are not limited to,
non-consensual communications (i.e., face-to-face, telephone, email, and
social media), threatening or obscene gestures, surveillance or showing
up outside the targeted individual's classroom, residence or workplace.
+ NACAU Title IX Coordinator Training
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
+ SCICU Title IX Coordinator Training
Part 1
Part 2
+ NGU Adjudicator/Advisor Training
Adjudicator Training: 2020 - 2021
+ NGU Investigator Training
Training August 2020
|